I've hit walls with traditional SQL databases while building web applications. Evolving schemas become nightmarish migration scripts, and unstructured data doesn't fit neatly into rows and columns. That's where NoSQL databases come in - they don't replace SQL but solve specific problems.

The term 'NoSQL' stands for 'Not Only SQL,' which is a vague name. It covers various database architectures that don't use the relational model with tables, rows, and SQL queries. Instead, they're built around different data models for specific use cases.

There are several types of NoSQL databases. Document databases like MongoDB store data as JSON-like documents, useful for varying data structures or nested data. Key-value stores like Redis are dictionaries, ideal for caching, sessions, and real-time analytics where speed is crucial.

Wide-column stores like Cassandra are designed for massive scale, distributed across many machines and optimized for writing enormous amounts of data. Graph databases like Neo4j excel when data is about relationships, making relationship queries extremely fast.

If your SQL database is working fine, stick with it. However, consider NoSQL for scalability, flexibility with your data model, and performance. SQL databases scale vertically, while NoSQL databases scale horizontally, adding more machines to the cluster.

However, you're giving up things SQL provides for free, like ACID transactions and query flexibility. You often have to think more carefully about how you structure and access your data. The CAP Theorem states that every distributed system must pick two of three properties: Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance.

Building with NoSQL requires understanding your access patterns before designing your data model. You need to denormalize and structure data around how you'll actually use it. Start by picking the right database for your problem, then experiment with a hosted solution if you're just starting out.

Design your data model around your queries, not your entity relationships. Implement basic CRUD operations first and understand how indexes work in your database. When you're ready for production, think about replication and sharding.

Consider a to-do application. In SQL, you'd have separate tables for users, todos, and tags. In MongoDB, you might store each user with their todos and tags nested inside the document. This approach wins if your main query pattern is 'get this user's data.'

NoSQL databases aren't magic and aren't better than SQL in any absolute sense. They're tools optimized for specific problems. Use them when SQL genuinely doesn't fit, understand what you're giving up and what you're gaining, and spend time learning how your chosen database works.